Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Barbora Krejcikova vs Yafan Wang Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Krejcikova vs Wang analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Barbora Krejcikova vs Yafan Wang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Krejcikova 1 - 0 Wang
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Krejcikova has won 43.63% of points on their second serve, while Wang has won 46.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Krejcikova, in recent form, has won 53.07% of their opponent's second serve points, while Wang has won 50.62%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.16% and 37.84% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Krejcikova has saved 52.31% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wang has saved 59.34% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Krejcikova has won 53.13% of matches played (W/L 17/ 15), with Wang winning 63.79% (W/L 37/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Krejcikova has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 70% (W/L 230/ 99), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 54% (W/L 13/ 11). Wang has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 88% (W/L 14/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 44/ 38).
- Player level: In the last year, Krejcikova has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 58.82% of matches (W/L 10/ 7), where as Wang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 24/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Krejcikova winning 1 times and Wang being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Krejcikova winning 2 and Wang winning 1. The last match between Krejcikova and Wang was at the BMW Malaysian Open - Kuala Lumpur, 29-02-2016, First, Hard with Barbora Krejcikova getting the victory 6-4 1-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:52:27.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Krejcikova and Wang have played a deciding set 1 times, with Krejcikova winning 1 times and Wang 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Krejcikova winning 0, and Wang 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Krejcikova has played against opponents with an average rank of 71.59 while Wang has played against players with an average rank of 217.84.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Krejcikova has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wang has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Krejcikova has converted 42.97% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wang has converted 40.09% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
31
Rank
2
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
72
Rank
47
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
65% (398-217)
Career Total W/L
61% (343-220)
44% (7-9)
YTD W/L
46% (13-15)
$6,138,707
Career Prize Money
$1,505,667
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Barbora Krejcikova vs Yafan Wang For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Krejcikova VS Wang
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
Krejcikova VS Wang H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Barbora Krejcikova | Yafan Wang |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 13 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| DFs Total | 4 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:27 | 1:52:27 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (54/85) | 69% (52/75) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (36/54) | 75% (39/52) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (14/31) | 35% (8/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 27% (3/11) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (28/75) | 41% (35/85) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Krejcikova VS Wang H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 1-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Barbora Krejcikova
Player
Yafan Wang
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Barbora Krejcikova | Yafan Wang |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 44% (7/9) | 46% (13/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (19/21) | 47% (30/34) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (182/189) | 48% (290/308) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 58% (11/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/4) | 33% (2/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/3) |
| Aces pg | 0.31 | 0.23 |
| Aces Total | 56 | 69 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 68 | 86 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:58 | 1:50:55 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 91.63 | 183.46 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (722/1201) | 61% (1231/2003) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (490/722) | 63% (779/1231) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (209/479) | 47% (361/772) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (55/128) | 40% (93/232) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (499/1187) | 43% (894/2091) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (4/2) | 60% (3/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (3/6) | 46% (6/7) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (7/16) | 46% (13/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 33% (3/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 38% (3/8) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (6/4) | 83% (12/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (6/2) | 17% (12/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 30% (10/3) | 19% (16/3) |
Barbora Krejcikova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Leylah Annie Fernandez
Player
Barbora Krejcikova
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasia Potapova
Player
Barbora Krejcikova
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Barbora Krejcikova
Player
Harriet Dart
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Barbora Krejcikova
Player
Daria Saville
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktorija Golubic
Player
Barbora Krejcikova
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
47%
(
35 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Barbora Krejcikova
42%
(
40 of
96)
1st Serve %
50%
(
62 of
123)
8
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
16
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
54%
(
30 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
59 of
123)
120
Total Points Won
99
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaqueline Cristian
Player
Barbora Krejcikova
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
48%
(
36 of
75)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
2-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronika Kudermetova
Player
Barbora Krejcikova
66%
(
80 of
122)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
51 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
95)
109
Total Points Won
108
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Barbora Krejcikova
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
77)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Barbora Krejcikova
Player
Sara Sorribes Tormo
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve %
81%
(
22 of
27)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
32
Total Points Won
17
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Yafan Wang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Magda Linette
Player
Yafan Wang
41%
(
21 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amelia Rajecki
Player
Yafan Wang
60%
(
55 of
92)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
6
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
3
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
24 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(5) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Yafan Wang
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dayana Yastremska
Player
Yafan Wang
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yafan Wang
Player
Maria Timofeeva
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktoriya Tomova
Player
Yafan Wang
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yafan Wang
Player
Lin Zhu
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
89
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Yafan Wang
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katie Volynets
Player
Yafan Wang
85%
(
63 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
86
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Yafan Wang
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Krejcikova Vs Wang Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Krejcikova are available here and Wang photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Barbora Krejcikova
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Yafan Wang
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
